![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:00 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I am impressed Chevy. You finally made a good looking truck.
And it's an LS, so it shouldn't cost much more than the Colorado and it makes more sense.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:03 |
|
Way to fill a vacant market, GM, even batman has haul shit sometimes.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:05 |
|
true, but still, i hate this approach angle, it makes it uncapable for offroading.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:07 |
|
HOLY SHIT A NEW SILVERADO WITHOUT CHROME.
This is truly amazing.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:08 |
|
10/10 would drive if it came in diesel with the exhaust brake.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:09 |
|
Actually Ram started with a limited release of an all black truck, and that sold so well they made it a permanent option. I figured that would be a solid sign that chrome isn't cool, but then they completely fucked up the limited.
2014 Limited
2015 Limited
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:10 |
|
Until they update the Duramax/Allison, it's still Powerstroke all the way for me.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:11 |
|
I know. That is my single biggest complaint about GM's, it's not the gaping hole in their quality control, it's all the fucking cheap chrome they puke on everything. THEY FIXED IT!
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:13 |
|
1. It's not meant to be a Jeep.
2. It's going to be lifted with 20x12 wheels installed, and taken through a couple of puddles once.
3. The air dam will come off.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:15 |
|
Oh good god that '15 is horrible
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:18 |
|
Ok, not meant to be a JEEP. I used the wrangler because the image was neat.
Lets use other pickups
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:22 |
|
The back is worse.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:24 |
|
With the air dam removed it should be pretty decent.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:29 |
|
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:33 |
|
Is it meant to be removable? It would be decent, as you say.
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:34 |
|
Couldn't agree more. Hell I've bitched about it here before.
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/chevy-will-nev…
![]() 02/12/2015 at 18:37 |
|
![]() 02/13/2015 at 00:15 |
|
is that real?
![]() 02/13/2015 at 00:49 |
|
Sadly, yes. http://www.autoblog.com/2015/02/12/201…
![]() 02/13/2015 at 03:04 |
|
it looks much better without it, but it must be there for MPG who knows.
![]() 02/13/2015 at 03:09 |
|
It is, but MPG loss is only like .5 of a MPG.